I calculated last year that if I lived a slightly-above-average lifespan and read a book a week for the rest of my life, I could read about 2500 more books in my lifetime.
This does not seem like nearly enough.
But I won't even read that many if I keep up my current pace, so we'll need to step up our game in 2014.
Now, if I read two books a week for the rest of my life (presuming a slightly-above-average lifespan), I could get a good 5000 more books read. And that seems more reasonable than 2500.
So I decided to set 100 books a year as a goal.
I can't decide whether to get a list going and be organized about it or to grab the nearest book and read.
If I had a list of 100 books, I'd always have an idea of what to read next. And I could put together some mutually illuminating selections.
If I just grabbed books that looked good, maybe I'd finish more books.
It's tough to say which is better.
It's hard to self-educate. Much easier when someone else is assigning your reading list. My best grad school classes had a one-page syllabus. 15 weeks, 15 books, one paper. Boom.
Maybe I should just make up seven courses with 15 books apiece. There's an idea.
In any case, I've already finished my first book of the year. The fact that I only had twenty pages left to read is irrelevant. I'm declaring myself off to a good start.
I'm planning to get my reading off to a quick start in the same way! I think I have 20% left of Lewis's "On Stories" left to go, to that will be my first book of the year!
ReplyDelete:-)
ReplyDeleteI'm nearly done with Kristen lavansdatter- all 1100 pages. It's been worth the time!
ReplyDelete